Breaking Bad Essay

Breaking terrible is an American dramatization arrangement delivered and made by Vince Gilligan The arrangement debuted on January the twentieth 2008. Airing on AMC in the us and Canada The show is at present in its fifth and last season, the second 50% of the show is disclosed the mid year of 2013. The arrangement is about Walter white he is a science instructor, Walter White, is determined to have Stage III disease and allowed just two years to live, he chooses he has nothing to lose. He lives with his significant other and young child, who has cerebral paralysis, in New Mexico. Resolved to guarantee that his family will have a protected future, White sets out on a vocation of medications and wrongdoing. He ends up being strikingly capable in this new world as he starts assembling and selling methamphetamine with one of his previous understudies. The arrangement tracks the effects of a lethal conclusion on an ordinary dedicated man and investigates how a deadly determination influences his profound quality and changes him into a significant player of the medication exchange Walter white develops over the seasons from a naã ¯ve chemisty educator to the driving force behind a huge scope tranquilize activity. Gathering Breaking Bad has gotten broad basic approval and has been commended by certain pundits as the best TV show ever. It scored a 99/100 on its keep going season on metaoritic. Metacritic is an audit site that joins all the accessible surveys out there. Grants The seriers has won various honors and designations. Counting 7 emmy grants. The entertainer of walter white, bryan Cranston has won the extraordinary lead on-screen character grants for 3 back to back years. Altogether the show has won 35 industry grants and been named for 117

Minorities At Risk And Horizontal Inequality Assignment

Minorities At Risk And Horizontal Inequality - Assignment Example Multi-party legislative issues has been presented in numerous nations as a method of changing and improving administration. The expanded political seriousness has anyway incited ill will between networks. The minority bunch winds up being politically underestimated and a chance of contention is genuine. The circumstance has offered ascend to control sharing plans in certain nations after a vicious showdown provoked by multi-party races. Tending to all the current level imbalances among the ethnic gatherings is significant both in nations where fierce clashes have happened and in possibly unstable districts. Three classes of approaches have been recognized to address the social disparities to be specific the immediate, backhanded and integrationist draws near. Direct methodologies advocate for governmental policy regarding minorities in society where recently underestimated bunches are given inclinations in access to instruction, political portrayal, and work. The methodology, notwith standing, may inspire uneasiness among networks not profiting by such approaches. To maintain a strategic distance from a potential clash such activities ought to be given an unmistakable time span inside which they can be utilized to address the difference. Backhanded methodologies include arrangements that in a roundabout way advance incorporation of all networks in the financial, social and political frameworks. The may incorporate devolution of both financial and political dynamic component. Such arrangements are anyway delayed in taking impacts and might be deficient in tending to all the even imbalances existing.

Why You Shouldnt Take Venture Capital Money When You Dont Need It

Why You Shouldn’t Take Venture Capital Money When You Don’t Need It Not enough money when needed â€" but aplenty available when you are not seeking…that is the way the venture capital market works!It is ironic really â€" investors are not all too keen on investing in your business in the initial stages when you actually need money to get established and grow. But once you take off and have proven yourself as a successful business venture, they are ready to battle with other investors to give you venture capital money for your business, money that you may not necessarily be in need of at that particular point in time.Venture capitalists like to cover their risks and therefore, they feel safer investing in your business when it is running along nicely. They may not have given you money for product development but if the new product you have launched has taken over the market and is getting a good response, venture capitalists would like to have a part in your success by giving you money for further investment. However, the question you need to ask yo urself is “do you need VC money or not?” © Shutterstock.com | SIHASAKPRACHUMIn this article, you will learn about 1) the advantages of taking venture capital money, 2) the 9 reasons why you shouldnt take VC money when you dont need it, and 3) how to politely decline an investment offer from an investor.ADVANTAGES OF TAKING VENTURE CAPITAL MONEYOut of all the different funding options available to you, venture capital is a safe choice. There are a number of benefits associated with venture capital money. To begin with, it fuels your business. You may have a great idea but no money to translate the idea into a viable business. Venture capitalists give you the money to move ahead and materialize your business idea.If you are already in business, you can use the venture capital for growth and development. You can expand your product line or grow your reach by expanding your target market and entering new markets.Your existing revenue may be getting consumed in maintaining your business operations; venture capital provides you spare funds for enhancements. Venture capital can help you improve your business processes and give you funds for automation and technological development.One of the most enticing features of venture capital is that since it is equity and not a loan, you will not have to worry about repaying it. With venture capital, you get access to money for doing business without having to fulfill loan application formalities and without having to worry about following a repayment schedule. You are spared from paying off exorbitant interest rates and meeting the terms and conditions of a loan.Venture capitalists get to participate in your business operations and contribute towards decision-making. They are experts at analyzing business opportunities and therefore can give you useful insight that can be beneficial for your business’s future. Quite a lot of them are good business managers as well. So you get to have an extra pair of hands to help you manage your business operations.Venture capit alists have a vested interest in your business’s success and therefore they can give you access to their contacts. This will give you a chance to enhance your business network and get connected with professionals who can share their experiences and give you valuable business advice. Venture capitalists can also get you in touch with specialists and consultants whose expertise can be fruitful for you. For example, an HR consultant can help you with hiring competent staff for your business.Interested in a quick introduction to what Venture Capital is all about? Read this slides.[slideshare id=3188792doc=insiteventurecapital101-100215190248-phpapp02w=640h=330]REASONS WHY YOU SHOULDN’T TAKE MONEY WHEN YOU DON’T NEED ITWho doesn’t want money? When the money is there â€" you should take it, right? Sounds awkward that you should say no to an investor? But should you always welcome investment even if you don’t need it?With venture capital, you should proceed with caution. Just as everything else does, venture capital also has a downside to it; which is why there are sound reasons why you shouldn’t take money when you don’t necessarily need it.#1: Investors Become PartnersVenture capital money is equity; thus, venture capital allows investors to become partners in your business. You are literally giving a part of your business to the investor in return for their money. This means they get a share in your business decisions and most importantly, in your business’s success.So if you are making profit, you won’t get to keep the entire profit to yourself, you will have to share a percentage of it with your investors. This percentage will depend upon the percentage of equity share of the investor. The more investors or venture capitalists you have, the greater chunk of your profit will go to them.You Lose your Freedom to ChangeIf you want to exit from a particular market or withdraw a particular product from your product line, you cannot just take the deci sion in isolation and implement it.Since the investors are owners as well, for any bigger change you want to bring in your business, you would have to consult with the venture capitalists. You need to get their consent before implementing any changes. Therefore, you lose your freedom to change.You Divide your Decision Making Authority Make the Decision Making Process potentially LongerWhen you were the sole owner of your business, you had the complete decision making authority with yourself. But now you would have to consult your venture capitalists while making decisions. This can sometimes elongate the decision making process. The more venture capitalists involved, the more time it may take to reach a unanimous decision.Learn everything about going from your business idea to IPO and the startup funding process.#2: The Venture Capitalists May Not Have the ExpertiseSome investors are more involved and are willing to help you with your business; the rest aren’t as involved and not interested in interfering in your business operations. Then there are some who are unable to help you because they don’t have the expertise. They may be from a different field or background and therefore, not have much knowledge regarding the kind of market you are working in.Such venture capitalists get to have a share in your business’s success without contributing anything towards it (apart from their money of course).#3: The Venture Capitalists’ Expectations May be Too HighSince venture capitalists want to get the most out of their investments, their expectations may be too high, always keeping you under pressure.They may expect decisions and changes to bring results too quickly and get dissatisfied with a change if it doesn’t bring results as per their expectations. They may expect new product development to happen in unrealistically short times or demand you to deliver the final product much sooner than your process allows you to. They may have unrealistic expectation s concerning the number of hours you put-in in a day or your availability during holidays and weekends.#4: Investors Gain a Say in How You Are Running your BusinessWhen investors fund your business, they gain an influence over your business’s management. Some investors may not like to interfere in your day-to-day operations and short-term management decision; whereas others like to be involved in all the day-to-day matters of your business.Your way of running the business may differ from theirs but the thought of losing venture capital may force you to compromise and run your business the way investors want you to.#5: Investors Will Always Ask for Progress ReportsIn order to safeguard your investments, you will have to continuously prove your worth. Investors like to keep tabs on their investments and anticipate profits; therefore, they will keep bothering you with inquiries about how things are going and what results your business is achieving. You will have to collect and presen t data and numbers so investors are aware about how your business is progressing. They will continuously demand progress reports from you on a regular basis so they know that their investment is safe and earning a high return.#6: Investors may De-Track you (Due to Different Company Strategy Expectations)You may want to focus on a new target market you have recently identified for yourself but the investors may keep you busy in preparing a presentation for the next investors’ meeting. You may want to improve customer services but the investors may want you to explore the option of revamping your business’s website.What is important for you may not be as important to your investors; their priority list may differ from yours, de-tracking you from what you want to do. Other situations concerning investors may also become a source of distraction for you. Rather than working on your strategy, you may have to spend your time and effort in trying to contact the investors so they are ava ilable for meetings at the decided time.#7: Self-Reliance is the Best Kind of RelianceIf you set-up, grow and run your business with your own money, you own the entire business. You are your own boss, answerable to no one but you. Being the sole proprietor makes you depend on yourself. No one can match the level of commitment and passion you have for your business and therefore, it is best to rely on yourself for financing the business as compared to availing any other option â€" including venture capital.Things may not always run smoothly and when your business is faced with a tough time, the investors may not be very helpful (but they would still be expecting you to deliver results). Therefore, relying on self is the best kind of reliance.#8: It May Become Difficult to Take all Investors On-BoardWhile making decisions, short-term and long-term, conflicts may arise between the different investors. They may put you in a difficult situation and it may become hard for you to resolve t hese conflicts peacefully. These conflicts can arise due to different reasons including varying backgrounds, experiences and expertise of the investors as well as differences in their interests (one may want to expand customer base while other may want to focus on improving retention rate of existing customers).#9: Getting Venture Capital Money is Associated with High Legal CostsSince high stakes are involved, a venture capital deal has to go through rigorous legal and accounting formalities. Both parties need to go over the terms and agreements of the deal over and over again.For this, you would need to hire a legal expert or a professional accountant â€" who charge heftily for their services. So ultimately, the venture capital deal costs you a lot in terms of paying accounting and legal consultant fees.HOW TO POLITELY SAY ‘NO’ TO AN INVESTOREven though you may not need the money at the particular point in time, you could need it at some point in time in the future. You don’t want to blatantly say no to investors and offend them because you might need to ask for investments later on. Here are a few ways of politely saying no to them right now but keeping doors open for future:Ask them to Reschedule their MeetingMake an excuse of being busy with some unavoidable commitment. This way you indirectly communicate to them that meeting with them isn’t a high priority for you since you aren’t looking for investors. So you aren’t actually saying ‘no’ while at the same time letting them know that they aren’t urgently needed by your business.Explain your Priorities to ThemYou can let them know that you are not looking to grow right now and that your strategy is to strengthen your existing customer base. You can tell them that you have not reached your economies of scale yet.Ask them about their Other Investment InterestsAsk them about the other companies they are considering investing in, and subtly reflect that the other options are good options. Give them strong reasons as to why they should move ahead with another company, but don’t be too pushy. This can give them an idea that you aren’t interested in their investment proposal.Communicate Openly HonestlyBe honest with the investors and let them know that currently you are not looking for investment for your business. Your genuine attitude will enable them to take the offer rejection positively and also keep the doors of investment open for you.Tell them you Need Time to Think/Analyze Their OfferListen to the investment offer and ask them to give you time for looking deeper into the terms and conditions of the agreement. This way you can buy some time and then politely say no rather than saying no to them upfront. This way the investors feel that at-least you gave a chance to their offer and that you spent time in considering it.Set your Own TermsInvestors like to set-up investment terms that put them in an advantageous position; rather than saying no, put forward your ow n terms and conditions. Chances are that the investors will back-off from the offer themselves.CONCLUSIONThe business world is full of risks. Whether you accept a venture capitalist’s offer or reject it, think twice and then once more. You should have solid reasons for your decision and your focus should be on the long-term effects.If you have worked out the long-term goals for yourself, you will have a clearer picture of the future of your business. If you feel that in future, your growth and expansion plans will require you to seek venture capital, then evaluating and accepting a few of the current offers may be the right decision for you.If you do not foresee the need for money in the long-term even, then giving ownership of your business in return for investment money may not be a smart decision.Support your decision to accept or reject investments with logically strong reasons; if you decide to move ahead with venture capital funding then try to get investors that share the s ame business interests/background as yours and those that bring more to the business than just money.

The Beheading of Precious Doe

On April 28, 2001, the nude, decapitated body of a 3-year-old girl was found near an intersection in Kansas City, Missouri. Two days later her head was found nearby in a plastic garbage bag. It would be more than four years before the girl, given the name Precious Doe by police, would be identified as Erica Green. Sketches, computer drawings and busts of the child were distributed nationwide and on several television crime programs before a relative came forward and identified the victim on May 5, 2005. Mother, Stepfather Charged in Case The Precious Doe case had frustrated police for four years and had been featured on several television crime shows, including Americas Most Wanted.   In the end, police say, it was a tip from a family member that finally helped authorities identify the child and also those responsible for her death. Press reports said a grandfather of one of the principles involved came forward and provided police with photographs of Erica as well as hair samples from the child and the mother. On May 5, 2005, Michelle M. Johnson, the 30-year-old mother of Erica, and Harrell Johnson, 25, her stepfather, were arrested and charged with murder. Police said Johnson told them he was under the influence of alcohol and PCP when he became angry with Erica when she refused to go to bed. He kicked her, threw her on the floor, and left her there unconscious. Erica remained on the floor unconscious for two days, because the couple refused to seek medical help because they both had warrants out for their arrest, police said. After Erica died the Johnsons carried her to a church parking lot, then into a wooded area where the stepfather cut her head off with hedge clippers. Ericas body was found near an intersection and two days later her head was found nearby in a plastic trash bag. On December 3, 2005, prosecutors announced that they would seek the death penalty in the case against Harrell Johnson. Authorities believed that the child died while Johnson was decapitating her with hedge clippers. Cousin Sheds Light on the Abuse Suffered by Erica According to Harrell Johnsons cousin, Lawanda Driskell, The Johnsons moved in with Driskell in April 2001. Michelle Johnson helped her husband dispose of Erica by placing the dead child in a stroller as if she was asleep. Later, she told Driskell that she had given Erica to another woman to raise. She described Harrells treatment of Erica as abusive, stating that he beat her for small infractions such as crying or not wanting to eat. One day she heard a loud bang coming from childs room and for the next two days, Erica was kept in the room. The couple told Driskell that the child was sick. Michelle Johnson then told Driskell that she took Erica to live with the woman who first raised the child. Michelle Johnson Pleads Guilty   On September 13, 2007, Michelle Johnson pleaded guilty to second-degree murder of her 3-year-old daughter. In a plea deal, she agreed to testify against her husband, Harrell Johnson, who was charged with first-degree murder. In return, prosecutors agreed to recommend a 25-year-sentence for the mother of the murdered child. Precious Does Mom Testifies Against Husband Michelle Johnson told the jury that Harrell Johnson was on drugs when he kicked her daughter in the head and the child dropped to the floor unconscious. He just picked up his feet and kicked her on the side of the face. I said, What the (expletive) did you do? It shook him out of his high, Johnson said. She said she put the child in a tub of cold water, but she failed to come around. She then put her on the bedroom floor where she stayed for two days before she died. Fearing that she might be arrested on outstanding warrants, Johnson made the decision to not call for medical help. Guilty Verdict A Kansas City jury deliberated for about three hours before returning a guilty verdict. Harrell Johnson, 29, was charged with the death and the decapitation of three-year-old Erica Green, the daughter of his then-girlfriend who he married a year later.   Johnson was also convicted of endangering the welfare of a child and abuse of a child. During closing arguments, prosecutors told the jury that a guilty verdict would finally bring justice for Erica. This selfish coward made the decision to put himself before this 3-year-old childs life, said prosecutor Jim Kanatzar. Sentenced On November 21, 2008, Harrell Johnson was sentenced to life without parole.

Violence In Schools Is A Big Social Issue That Occurs Almost

Violence in schools is a big social issue that occurs almost everyday throughout the United States. There is no way to tell when it is going to happen, but when it does, people need to be prepared. This violence leads to devastating effects on the students, teachers, and families of these kids. Some violence that occurs within the schools across the United States include physical, mental, or sexual abuse, theft, vandalism, and, the most common form, fighting and bullying. One form of violence within schools that doesn’t come to mind right away though, is gun violence. Going to a smaller school in a smaller community, this wasn’t a big concern, but it can happen within any school, anywhere. Gun violence, not just within schools, but†¦show more content†¦While the concern is understandable parents should not be afraid to send their kids to school worried that something like this will happen. By doing this parents can actually harm the mental health of their children. It is also wondered if schools bring about the victimization or if it is brought into them from outside sources. A study was performed to assess the extent to which high school kids felt threatened or victimized by a threat or an actual attack using a gun. An anonymous, volunteer survey of 1653 students of both genders was taken inside a high school. 23% of the the student’s were categorized as victims. Therefore, those students have a higher risk of victimization than students who didn’t fit into this category. Some factors that played a role in predicting the levels of victimization were gender and if they were involved in violent actions outside of school. It is concluded that violence is brought into the school rather than being provoked or produced by the school. Children can have psychological effects due to gun violence, both short and long term. Those exposed to the violence can have effects such as anger, posttraumatic stress disorder, withdrawals, and desensitization to violence. (Garbarino et al., 2002). Exposure of gun violence to children, especially those who have been injured due to it, those who have witnessed it, or those who experience it quite often within the schools are at a greater risk for those negativeShow MoreRelatedProblems and Solutions to Violence in Schools Essay1239 Words   |  5 PagesViolence is a very important issue that is coming to the front in todays school systems. School violence is a `complex social policy problem and is considered very complicated and hard to define. My paper is on school violence and the methods in which the government and schools can provide support and/or programs to help stem the recent rash of incidents. These steps include: use of `less violent materials, peer mediation interventio ns, police presence and action, individualizing of the troublemaker(s)Read MoreYouth Violence: Identify the Cause and Work Towards Prevention1494 Words   |  6 Pagesdictionary, Violence is the exertion of physical force so as to injure or abuse. Violence is often a behavioral response that children are taught to use in order to achieve their goals. On the other hand, violence can become a routine and automatic way of coping with stressful situations for some children (Youth Violence and Suicide Prevention Team 1999). You violence is an old problem that is frequently an issue over which there is much debate. Unfortunately, the increasing violence amongst childrenRead MoreEssay on Bullying and Violence in Public Schools1365 Words   |  6 PagesBullying and Violence in Public Schools Although bullying has always been a problem in schools, it has more recently become a bigger crisis with vicious consequences. â€Å"However it is defined, bullying is not just child’s play, but a terrifying experience many schoolchildren face everyday. It can be as direct as teasing, hitting or threatening, or as indirect as exclusions, rumors or manipulation† (Garrett 2). Most kids do not think certain actions are classified as bullying, yet theyRead MoreThe Correlation between Crime and Poverty Essay1122 Words   |  5 PagesA violent crime occurs every 23.5 seconds in the United States of America. Even though crime has been at a low during the past decade, violence is still prevalent in today’s society. Most of these crimes happen in places that are socio-economically disadvantaged. There then is the debate of whether violent crime is associated with environments struck with poverty. There is a correlation between violent crimes and poverty becaus e of the unemployment rates in major cities, the culture of poor areasRead MoreDomestic Violence in the United States1516 Words   |  7 PagesDomestic violence affects a large amount of relationships in the United States each year. As the times have changed, abuse has become less accepted as a normal occurrence, and society has begun working together to provide awareness towards violence in intimate partner relationships. â€Å"Problems of family violence are potentially the most destructive in our society† (Kurland 23). Domestic violence is a problem that begins in the home, and spreads to affect the world around it. Violence is present inRead MoreBullying Is A Modern Threat Of The Security Of Many People Around The World1726 Words   |  7 Pagesbully? There is no easy answer to that question, but a good place to start is by defining what a bully is. A bully is someone who uses strength and/or power to harm another individual. Bully is a label that most people do not wea r all the time, but almost everybody has bullied somebody else in their lifetime and have been bullied in their life. Bullying can be so extreme that it can bring physical harm to some people. Bullying is a modern threat to the security of many people around the world. To figureRead MoreArgumentative Essay On Cyber Bullying1705 Words   |  7 PagesAvian Williams Mrs. Crenshaw ENGL 2010 18 October 2017 The idea of cyberbullying is truly frightening, and the arrival of modern technology and the rise of social network make it even worst. With the invention of the Internet and its mass commercial use, some people might not have foreseen the issue of â€Å"cyberbullying† and how harmful it can really be. Cyberbullying is a real phenomenon that has been present for some time. Cyberbullying is defined as the use of the Internet and technology to purposelyRead MoreThe Issue Of Gun : Americas Lifeline Essay1686 Words   |  7 PagesGuns: Americas Lifeline One of the most debated and polarizing issues in modern day America is the issues surrounding the second amendment. The issue of gun control has been raging on in the American political scene for years and, talk about the issue has only grown. The debate has always been brought to the limelight after major shootings throughout the United States, most recently with the horrible attack at the nightclub in Orlando, Florida. According to the crowd sourced website, Mass ShootingRead MoreTeens And Teenage Depression892 Words   |  4 Pagestheir parent’s youth. Teenagers are suffering from stress that is not understandable by people from the previous generations since this wasn’t as big an issue in the centuries that have passed. Due to this, teenagers aren’t comfortable with acknowledging the fact that they are suffering through this and most certainly aren’t comfortable sharing this issue with their parents because they wouldn’t be able to understand the seriousness of this use. There are many factors that lead to adolescents sufferingRead MoreBullying in America Essays1107 Words   |  5 Pagestreat abusively† (Merriam-Webster). There is more than one way to abuse someone. So a complete definition, that comes from www.bullyingstatistics.org, is any type of verbal, social, physical, and cyberbullying abuse that occurs (Naas). Bullying is seen everywhere. It is talked about in movies, media, songs, and inside school programs. What makes the bullies, or aggressors, do what they want? How does the bullying effect everyone? Let us start with why the bullies bully. Ian Rivers, of Brunel University

How Successful Was the New Economic Policy Free Essays

string(51) " true society republic of workers and peasants’\." The New Economic Policy (NEP) was a measure implemented in order to counter the arguably disastrous effects War Communism. The New Economic is controversial. Some historians argue it allowed the Soviet economy to solidify and begin to recover, and also allowed the Bolsheviks to retain control over Russia. We will write a custom essay sample on How Successful Was the New Economic Policy or any similar topic only for you Order Now Others, like Orlando Figes, state it was ultimately a failure, arguing that under the NEP the peasants grew away from the Bolshevik regime, inviting a future, and brutal, reassertion of central control. This essay will discuss the effectiveness of the NEP economically and politically as well as outlining War Communism and why it failed Michael Lynch argues that ‘By 1921, the grim economic situation had undermined the original justification for war communism. During its operation, industrial and agricultural production had fallen alarmingly. ’ War Communism was first introduced as an extreme economic measure in order to deal with problems created during the Civil War as well as enabling the Army to be fed. However in accordance with Lynch, the policy did not improve Russia’s productivity or indeed the Bolshevik popularity. The existence of the Cheka and the Red Army enabled Lenin to embark on the policy of centralisation. This resulted in a considerable increase in Bolshevik influence in the factories via the infiltration of the Workers’ committees by political commissars. This development helped prepare the way for issuing the Decree of Nationalisation in June 1918 and within two years it brought practically all major industrial enterprises in Russia under central government control. Yet nationalism did nothing to increase production due to being imposed at the time of severe industrial disruption caused initially by the strains of World War One but which worsened during the Civil War. Furthermore the military needs were given priority thus denying resources to those industries not considered essential. The situation was made more serious by factories being deprived of man power as a result of conscription into the Red army and flight from urban areas of large numbers of inhabitants who left in search of food or by means of escape from the Civil War. This led to the population of Petrograd and Moscow to drop by half between 1918 and 1921 causing a dramatic decrease in Russia’s productivity. Problems were deepened further by hyper-inflation. The scarcity of goods and the government’s policy of continuing to print currency notes effectively destroyed the value of money and by the end of 1920 the rouble had fallen to 1% of its worth in 1917. Ultimately War Communism tightened the Bolshevik’s grip on industry but did not lead to economic growth. Agriculture was also largely affected by War Communism. A major purpose of War Communism was to force the peasants to provide more food. However peasants were resistant to the government’s demands and this was largely blamed on the Kulaks who the Bolsheviks claimed were hoarding the grain. As a result the government become infuriated by the peasant’s refusal to conform and condemned them as counter-revolutionaries and restored to coercion. Cheka requisition units were sent into the countryside to take the grain by force. In 1920 the order was given to hang one hundred kulaks publically in order to terrify the population however this seemed to have the reverse effect of the one intended. With the knowledge that any surplus would be confiscated, peasants produced the bare minimum to feed themselves and their family. By 1921 a combination of requisitioning, draught and general disruption of war resulted in national famine with grain harvests in 1920 and 1921 being less than half that gathered in 1913. The matters became so desperate that the Bolsheviks admitted famine and accepted foreign assistance however foreign help was too late to prevent mass starvation. Of the 10 million of the Civil War period over half starved to death. Although War Communism proved catastrophic in terms of industrial and agricultural output the Bolsheviks saw it as true socialism due to the squeezing of the peasants and the ending of private ownership. Even after the Red Army’s victory in the Civil War, the policy of War Communism was maintained. As a short-term measure the policy produced the results Lenin wanted but severity increased Bolshevik unpopularity resulting in a number of minor outbreaks of resistance during the 1920s. But the Kronstadt Rising of 1921 proved to be highly disturbing to Lenin as he described it as the ‘lightening flash that illuminated the true reality of things’. Lynch claims that ‘As long as unrest was confined to the peasants and the Bolsheviks’ political enemies it was a containable problem’ but Lenin began to worry over the development of War Communism within the party itself. The two prominent Bolsheviks involved Alexander Shlyapnikov, labour commissar, and Alexandra Kollontai, who led a ‘workers’ Opposition’ movement against the excess of war communism. Kollontai accused party leaders of losing touch with the proletariat and from this, groups of workers in Petrograd went on strike in early 1921 justifying their actions in the proclamation than change is needed in the policies of the government. By February 1921 thousands of Petrograd workers crossed the naval base on Kronstadt claiming that Russia should be better, not worse, than Tsarist times ,as the Bolshevik government claimed Russia to be a workers’ state. In an attempt to pacify strikers Lenin sent a team of political commissars to Kronstadt who were greeted with derision. In early March, the sailors and workers of Kronstadt produced a manifesto. It was not the demands that frightened the Bolsheviks but the people who drafted them as the workers and sailors of Kronstadt had been great and popular supporters of the Bolsheviks in 1917. Shelia Fitzpatrick describes them as ‘The Kronstadters, heroes of the July Days and supporters of the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution, had become almost legendary figures in Bolshevik mythology. Now they were repudiating the Bolsheviks’ revolution, denouncing ‘the arbitrary rule of the commissar’ and calling for a true society republic of workers and peasants’. You read "How Successful Was the New Economic Policy" in category "Papers" The danger for the Bolsheviks was that due to their popularity of the Kronstadters revolted the rest of the people would be due to follow. The rising was finally crushed when Trotsky ordered the Red Army to storm the Kronstadt base with violent results. Lenin took an important lesson from the Kronstadt uprising which was to avoid scandal and embarrassment of another open challenge to his party and government and so decided it was time to soften his severity of war communism leading to the introduction of the NEP in order to tackle the famine and thus prevent further uprising. The majority of historians agree that the NEP was certainly an economic success compared to the catastrophe of War Communism with both Shelia Fitzpatrick and Orlando Figes agreeing that NEP was introduced as ‘an impoverished response to desperate economic conditions’. Lenin is a pragmatic character and so seeing that peasants could not be forced to produce more food so instead must be persuaded and thus temporarily abandon the idea of War Communism. The success of the NEP can in reality only be measured by its aims. The NEP was set up primarily to stabilise the economy; this included decreasing inflation, increasing agricultural and industrial production and re-establishing trade outside of the country. The other major aim of the policy was to minimise the gap between the worker and the peasant in order to get peasant co-operation and support. Due to the fact that the NEP was set up as a result of Kronstadt its other aim is to demolish the possibility of such a rebellion happening again. Many reforms took place in Russia due to the NEP. Under the NEP the Government stopped its policy of requisitioning the peasants entire crop and instead began to take only what was needed to meet the minimum requirements of the army and the urban workers. Fixed tax in kind was introduced and although the peasants were forced to pay the tax, they were now allowed to sell the remainder of their crop for profit. They could sell either privately or to the state. This gave peasants the initiative to grow more crops as a result the grain harvest went up from 37. 6 million tons in 1921 to 72. 5 million tons in 1925. This was a success of the NEP as it increased agricultural production to Russia’s pre-war levels, which helped to stabilise the economy. Nationalisation was minimised with only the large industries remaining under state control. However, this was still a lot as 85% of the workforce worked for state enterprises, the rest for private enterprises or co-operatives. Also conscription of the workforce was abandoned. Over the course of five years, the NEP allowed industrial and agricultural output to rise to its pre-war levels. In this sense, the NEP did achieve economic recovery. However, the NEP was bitterly disliked by many leading communists who saw it as a reversal of everything they believed which will be discussed later in the essay. Although industrial production increased at a slower pace than agricultural production, which caused many problems such as the scissors crisis in 1923, it did increase. For example, coal in 1921 did not exceed 8. million tons while in 1925, it was around 18. 1 million tons, and steel production increased nearly 10 times from 183 thousand tons being produced in 1921 to 2135 thousand tons in 1925. However industry did not attain the same levels of recovery as agriculture and did not reach the pre-war level. This shows that the NEP was successful in increasing industrial production. However, the increase in heavy industry was not as great as light industry, consequently it suffered in comparison. Trade with foreign countries was also reintroduced, as earlier it had been prohibited. The ban against free trade was lifted too so the whole population was permitted to trade with one another. The state only had control over 15% of the trade; the rest was under Nepmen or co-operative control. However, the boom in private trade led to a widening gap between rich and poor. This can clearly be seen by the sudden rise in unemployment in the first two years of the setting up of the NEP. There was a lot of anger focused on the Nepmen, who were seen as the ‘new class’, between rich and poor. The workers also felt resentful towards the Bolsheviks as they felt the NEP was sacrificing their class interests in favour of the peasantry. Therefore although the NEP allowed free trade and re-established foreign trade, not everyone benefited from it. And in fact this lead to the very thing communism went against class. Nepmen became the new beneficiaries, as they grew rich. Also, the gap between rich peasants and poor ones increased as class, once again became an issue. In addition, a new currency was set up to ease the economic problem. This currency was known as the chervontsy. However, they were in heavy demand and only available in large denominations. The rouble was still legal tender until February 1924. Inflation can clearly be seen as in January 1921 there was 1,169 milliards of roubles in circulation and by January 1923 there were 1, 9994,464 milliards. This clearly shows that a change in currency was needed. Although this helped the economy as the rate of inflation decreased slightly, it did not do enough to help the people and their financial difficulties. The NEP did minimise the gap between workers and peasants. The policy meant that peasants could make more of a profit as they were allowed to sell their own produce and trade with others. It also encouraged them to work harder. However, it was the peasants who suffered most due to inflation. Although they made money, it was worth little in industry. In this way the NEP had been partly a success as it had minimised the gap and made things better for the peasants but did not improve everything. As for the NEP’s other aim, that being avoiding another rebellion like Kronstadt, the policy was successful as there was no threat of them ever losing power. Although there were protests against the NEP or some parts of it, overall these were unthreatening to Bolshevik power and were ignored or came to an end after a while. Aside from economic issues, the NEP also caused dispute amongst the Bolsheviks themselves in political terms. As Fitzpatrick argues ‘From the communist standpoint NEP was a retreat, and a partial admission of failure. Many Communists felt deeply disillusioned: it seemed that the revolution had changed so little. ’ The NEP was a mixture of socialism and capitalism and was referred to as a â€Å"step back† for the Bolsheviks as they had just defended socialism in the civil war but was now retreating into capitalism and the â€Å"old ways†. A major objection from the Bolsheviks was the reintroduction of money and private trading had created the Nepmen. It was the profiteering that Victor Serge, a representative of the Left Bolsheviks, had in mind when he described the immediate social effects of NEP: ‘the cities we ruled over assumed a foreign aspect, we felt ourselves sinking into the mire. Money lubricated and befouled the entire machine just as under capitalism’ As the NEP had become such a contentious issue among the Bolsheviks Lenin introduced the banning of factionalism as well as outlawing all other parties except from Bolshevism. The object of this was to eliminate party disputes and political rivals and to a certain extent this worked. In conclusion, the NEP was successful to a certain extent. Because of the New Economic Policy the Soviet economy revived quickly. There was more food from the farmers; there were goods in the shops and outdoor markets, However many Bolshevik members did not consider the NEP as socialism and thought that it was a betrayal of communist principles. On the whole the NEP was a success. It met most of its aims. The policy helped stabilise the crumbling economy and re-established pre-war levels. The policy decreased the rate of inflation, it increased agricultural and industrial production, it allowed free trade and re-established foreign trade. However, some of these aims it only met partly. For example although the rate of inflation did decrease it was still very high and the NEP did not stop it completely. Industry production also suffered as a result of the NEP. Although its production increased its prices rose due to the fast increase of agriculture. Trade also caused problems like the re-establishment of classes. So these aims were only partly successful and created many other problems. The NEP tried to minimise the gap between peasants and workers. Many of the aims in stabilising the economy were for the peasants’ benefits like the end of requisitioning and allowing them to trade. However, the high prices in industry and high inflation left the peasants with money which was not worth as much. However, the policy did try to get peasant support. It was partly successful in bringing workers and peasants together, however many workers felt let down by the party that was supposed to cater to their needs. The fact no major rebellions threatened the Communists shows that the policy had kept many people happy and those that protested were insignificant or in such small numbers they were unable to mount a decent threat on the party. Thus the NEP was one of the major factors that had enabled the survival of Communism in Russia. The step back from socialism and the reintroduction of capitalism had worked. Peasant uprisings virtually ceased, the economy recovered and the Bolshevik regime was consolidated How to cite How Successful Was the New Economic Policy, Papers

Upstate South Carolina

The growth rate of the economy of Upstate South Carolina has been among those ranked as the fastest in the United States of America. The region has grown expansively from a traditionally textile-manufacturing region to a diverse and vast economic region endowed with almost each and every industry in the United States.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Upstate South Carolina specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More A number of reasons are responsible for this growth. These reasons include the availability of skilled workers, considerably low costs of conducting business and excellent educational and training institutions that yield high qualified workers. These are some of the reasons that made BMW and Michelin establish their North American headquarters in Greenville. This research paper will look at the economic history of Upstate South Carolina and its towns. Agriculture was the main economic activity in Upstate South Carolina before the onset of the industrialization period that saw the introduction of other industries in the region (Weir 67). Although tourism is the current leading source of income to the Upstate South Carolina, agriculture still contributes a substantial amount of income to the region. Upstate South Carolina is richly endowed with fertile soils that facilitate extensive mechanized cultivation of the cotton crop (South Carolina Department of Agriculture 13). The availability of this crop, coupled with the easy accessibility of water power, has led to the establishment of large textile and clothing industries which are centered in the piedmont. In the recent past, crop farmers in Upstate South Carolina have realized the need to diversify the range of crops grown and break away from the traditional cotton farming (Wallace 34). This has led to the cultivation of crops such as tobacco, sweet potatoes, peaches, soybeans and pecans. The growth of these crops has led to food su fficiency in the region. The fertile soils of Upstate South Carolina have also led to the emergence of lumbering activities and the manufacture of paper and pulp. These three economic activities derive their raw materials from the large forestland that covers a significant portion of the state. It is estimated that the size of land that is under tree cultivation is about five million hectares (Barry 98). The main species of trees grown are the loblolly pine and the longleaf which are ideal for paper manufacturing. A few decades after Greenville was termed as the â€Å"Textile Capital of the World,† it is amazing that it is now among the leading towns in Upstate South Carolina in terms of the developments of the automobile industry. The town is now home to leading international automobile industries such as Michelin, BMW, General Electric Company, Honeywell, 3M and the Lockhead Martin Aircraft and Logistics Center (Bainbridge 145).Advertising Looking for research paper on geography? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The towns of Spartanburg and Anderson have also advanced greatly in their economic status. For instance, Spartanburg is the headquarters of huge companies such as the QS/1 Data systems, Extended Stay Hotels, Advance America and Milliken and Company. Anderson is home to over two hundred and thirty manufacturers which include twenty two international companies. It is widely known for the plastic and automotive industries. Like the rest of the York counties, the towns of Spartanburg and Anderson are known for their extensive supply of BMW vehicles. It is evident from the foregoing discussion that Upstate South Carolina has gone through various stages of development in its economic history. The region has moved from its tradition of textile manufacturing to the development of other industries such as the automobile industry. The towns of Greenville, Anderson, Spartanburg and the York Counties have been at the center of this transformation. Works Cited Bainbridge, Judith. Historic Greenville: The Story of Greenville and Greenville County. Texas: Historical Publishing Network, 2008. Print. Barry, John. Natural Vegetation of South Carolina. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1970. Print. South Carolina Department of Agriculture. Cotton Mills of South Carolina: Their Names, Location, Capacity, and History. New York: Charleston, 1880. Print.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Upstate South Carolina specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Wallace, David. History of South Carolina. New York: American Historical Society, 1934. Print. Weir, Robert. Colonial South Carolina: A History. Millwood, New York: KTO Press, 1983. Print. This research paper on Upstate South Carolina was written and submitted by user Samantha Burt to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.